shittywebcomics:

Kate, I’m sure you find it oddly flattering in a way how ready and willing we anons at SWC to pounce upon your tweets. In all honesty, I feel like I’m providing you (and especially any other women smart enough to read this blog) a vital service. What few people who do call you out on your awful behavior are almost certainly inferior writers and trolls, because frankly, I’m really goddamn good.

The current climate of social media exasperates two related phenomenon. One: men aren’t telling women when their figurative shit stinks, and two: women are being taught explanations of gender roles from other women or from men taught by women to be latently ashamed of themselves. The punishment for calling out disgusting female behavior is attack via social avenues which good men who value honesty, being largely concerned with matters of actual importance, are thoroughly unequipped to manage. Most of her of female allies and aforementioned self-loathing types will support the woman for reasons of loyalty completely unrelated to any objective value judgements of the situation. The chicks probably know you’re being a cunt and just don’t want to deal with your political backbiting, but those poor fool sons of bitches probably actually believe they’re doing the right fucking thing.

Now I’m going to break down what this tweet reflects about you that no one other than the saints of comedy here at SWC will. This is what happened: a guy touched your back and you didn’t like it. Now, if you were a real tough chick who don’t need no man, you would have told him to keep his hands to himself or you’ll wear his huevos as earrings. But you’re not, you’re a gigantic pussy. You fucking tweeted how much you wanted other people to “murder” a human being man for getting fresh with you. And it only gets worse:

In subsequent tweets you bring out what I assume is a syringe of AIDS infected blood, and other means of death. And then we figure out why you’re so up in arms about it. He’s so old he’d have to be insane to think you’re in his league. You’re angry because you feel like your own appearance has been affronted by the very impudence implied by his thinking he had a chance with you. Here’s a hint, Kate: you’ve spent way too much time around weak men, and don’t pretend that’s not by design. I’ve seen what you look like, you’re nothing special. I’ve without hesitation rejected women far more attractive than you, for, well, doing shit exactly like this. Your social media bubble and circle of potential business connections friends have skewed your view of yourself so far beyond reality that you actually believe this:

Even if you did, what does it say about you that you feel entitled to call down a swarm on a person man simply because he wasn’t attractive and hit on you the wrong way? What if he was Italian and simply accustomed to a more touchy-feely culture? Would he still deserve AIDS, or were you being culturally insensitive? 

The crux of this, Kate, is that decent men are going to see this behavior and immediately relegate you to at best fuckbuddy status. This is textbook stupid cunt shit. It betrays a level of self-absorption and entitlement that is beyond pathological. You expect other people to do violence on your behalf, even if it’s only social violence. And then, you post that fucking video, and was the guy still there? Were you straight-up creep-shaming across the bar? I’m amazed you didn’t tweet a picture of the guy to eek out a bit more ego from this attention whoring power trip.

This is how I know, for a fact, you are not marriage material. Beyond the evidence that you have no goddamn empathy by publicly shaming this guy, you did it from the protection of a group because you are a fucking coward. There no fucking way in hell any man worth his beans would ever hitch a cowardly cunt, ever! It’s a blinking fucking neon sign saying “Worthless in a Crisis“ with a subtitle of ”Bails When Shit Goes South”. 

So yes, your instincts are correct: you are unmarriageable, and quite possibly even unlovable. 

MOD 1:  The saddest part of this is that she posted that not because she was creeped out, but because she wanted to display on public social media that a man desired her, but that she also had enough (perceived) social value to reject him, or rather wanted to create the illusion of social value by rejecting a man, which is sometimes the sole reason a woman rejects a man.  Mostly likely she was aroused by his move, and probably would still fuck the guy, but not after trashing him on twitter to make it look like “I don’t need no man” where all her friends can see, and then when the lights go out she sneaks off to blow him.  We’ve already seen her naked desire to be subservient to a dominant (even abusive) man, so that’s proven.  What more do we need to know?  We don’t need to see the cumshot over her face for it to be obvious.

This is the true purpose of feminism.  Just look at the picture at top, a proud feminist womyn “men are so stupid lol we just need a girls night out ugh men are so creepy” in such an obvious public way.  If it were a man it would be a picture of him posing next to some expensive car he just bought.  The “don’t need no man” selfie is the female equivalent of that.